Scott Murtishaw, executive director at the California Energy Storage Alliance, discusses local opposition, safety misconceptions, and why the state's containerised projects have proven safe.
Why it matters: Local opposition is the #1 killer of BESS projects; California’s safety data is your best weapon to win over skeptical planning boards.
Flick AI is a CRM for solar installers: the AI answers WhatsApp leads in seconds, builds proposals with automatic panel layouts and books the site visit. See how it works.
If you think technical specifications sell BESS projects in the EU right now, you’re dreaming. In the current climate—from the UK to the Alentejo—the biggest threat to your pipeline isn't interest rates; it’s a local councillor with a Facebook account and a fear of "lithium bombs." California is five years ahead of us on this curve, and Scott Murtishaw’s insights are a blueprint for navigating the inevitable pushback.
The Data Gap in Permitting
The "misinformation" Murtishaw cites usually centers on thermal runaway. In Europe, we’re seeing a rise in local opposition groups mimicking US tactics. To counter this, installers need to stop talking about MWh and start talking about NFPA 855 or the European equivalent IEC 62933-5-2. California’s success with containerized solutions (like those from Fluence or Tesla) isn't just about the tech; it's about the containment strategy. If you aren't leading your C&I pitch with fire suppression and blast venting specs, you're handing the ammunition to the opposition.
We are entering the "Safety First" era of storage sales. The installers who can explain why a 2MWh container won't level a neighborhood—using hard data from mature markets like California—will be the ones who actually get their projects built in 2025. Don't wait for the planning hearing to look up the fire specs.